GP Tuition: Sample GP Examination Paper – AJC
Looking urgently for online GP teachers who is an expert with the teaching sequence of Anderson Junior College? Let us at AceSpecialistHub help you to attain your desired GP distinction grade now!
Here’s a sample of Essay Paper (Paper 1) shared by our ex – AJC GP tuition pupil who attended our online classes for GP:
1. We must learn to live together like brothers, or we shall die like fools” (Martin Luther King).
Explore the truth of this statement in at least three fields of human endeavour.
2. “A mindless mixture of sex, violence and special effects.” Is this a fair assessment of most modern films?
3. “Anything too stupid to be said, is sung.” How far is this true of popular music today?
4. “Anything goes.” To what extent does this sum up the attitudes found in society today?
5. Describe two policies you would like the government of your country to change and explain why.
6. What should a good university education provide?
7. In what ways has your country suffered as a result of rapid economic development?
8. “Prevention is better than cure.’ Show how this proverb is applicable to any two problems facing your society today.
9. ‘All ideologies are dangerous and delusive. Discuss.
10. “Technology has lowered the value of human life.” Discuss.
11.To what extent would you consider your society to be truly civilized?
12. “The genetic modification of organisms takes mankind into the realm that belongs to God, and God alone.” What is your view?
Bonus Essay Question for Anderson Junior College JC GP tutoring group re the Topic of Science & Technology Issues
Q13: Technological advancements always bring about social equality. How far do you agree?
AJC General Paper Tuition – Sample Model GP Essay Answer
Here is a full length sample answer to the following GP essay question:
Q10. “Technology has lowered the value of human life.” Discuss.
The proliferation of technology in our daily lives has granted us speed, ease and convenience, be it at home or in our working environment. However, this raises the issue of whether human beings are being rendered redundant by the very technology that serves us. It seems that we have little need for so many people in the world, as the tasks performed by them can be easily carried out by machines. Proponents would like us to believe that human life has little value nowadays. Others say that it is through technology that we discover the true value of human life and strive to improve mankind. I truly and firmly believe that technology does not undermine the usefulness of human life, but merely augments our abilities. As indicated by public response to the announcement of the first cloned mammal, Dolly: even the most radical technology makes us treasure human life even more.
Many people who would say that technology devalues human life would be quick to cite weapons of mass destruction as their prime example. They say that the use of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons to kill and destroy has made human life almost worthless. To kill one is a tragedy, but when you kill ten thousand it is a mere statistic. These weapons, which can kill thousands in a wide area within a short period of time, are truly a threat to human life. However, it is not technology per se which has devalued human life. It is rather the people who control these weapons that are the ones who have little regard for life. Take away their technology and they will still scheme to create chaos. Disorder and anarchy will continue to hurt others, even if it means they have to use their own bare hands. In short, technology has merely provided opportunities for those who do not value the sanctity of human life.
Supporters of technology say that machines and computers have greatly helped us in our daily lives by performing many menial repetitive tasks. The calculation power of computers is absolutely essential in fields such as space exploration and nuclear physics. Therefore there is almost nothing for human beings to contribute in this modern age, as there is little value in a man who can calculate the value of pi up to fifty digits when we can just use a computer to calculate up to a hundred digits of pi and re-run the computer programme just to make sure. Use of robots in industry to assemble goods has diminished the need for human resources, too. Going by these arguments, it is not hard to understand why so many people are eager to proclaim that humans are no longer a valuable resource.
On the contrary, the widespread use of technology should open our eyes to the fact that it was, and still is, humans who create and develop technology which we all use nowadays. The brightest minds of the past and present were and are the men behind the machines and will continue to create new innovative technologies in the future. We still need humans to conceptualise and visualise new ideas which may have an impact on our lives in the future. It is hard to imagine machines replacing humans in the creative process, as machines are designed follow rules set by programmers and this limits them. As a result, machines are unable to “think” outside the box. Hence, humans are still important, as they are the “brains” behind the technology.
The realm of biological sciences is truly amazing and through the use of technology we have managed to accomplish feats previously unthinkable. For example, we have managed to clone mammals and we are able to integrate features of a particular species within a separate different species to create unique organisms through the use of genetic engineering. Astoundingly, the proclamation of the success of mammalian cloning was seen by some as the signal to the end of the value of human life. They envisioned a future where human life is just another commodity, to be traded for money just like gold, crops or oil. However, just because clones share the same genetic sequence does not mean that they are exact duplicates of one another, as even twins have identical gene sequences and yet are different and unique in their own ways. A life is still precious even if the person is genetically identical to another person.
Should the value of human life be measured by the contributions that the person is able to give then the use of technology has actually increased this value. Diagnostic tools such as x-rays and magnetic resonance imaging have allowed for earlier detection. of diseases, while advanced treatment methods. such as antibiotics and gene therapy have enabled us to enjoy longer and fuller lives. Thus human. beings nowadays are able to contribute more to society during their lifespan, as not only do they live longer, but they are able to work for a more prolonged duration, too. Leaps in biomedical sciences have therefore extended the usefulness of humans.
Moreover, advances in technology have enabled couples who were previously childless to be blessed with the gift of life. Technologies such as in-vitro fertilisations and fertility drugs have enabled many to be able to have children nowadays. Detractors will immediately say that because of the relative ease. with which these couples are able to obtain children the value of human life has definitely decreased. They fail to realise that parents who have finally managed to obtain children through the use of technology tend to treasure their children even more. It is a fallacy to say that human life is worthless, as the use of technology has enabled many more to share in the gift of human life. mistaken belief.
In conclusion, human life is truly precious and must be treasured carefully. It is wrong to say that technology has diminished the value of human life, as technology has made the unique qualities of man over machine appear more obvious. Technology is only the tool we use to augment our abilities and help us in our lives. Clothes may make the man, but technology definitely does not make mankind, rather man makes technology for his own use.
AJC GP Tuition teacher’s Comments: The word ‘realm’ can be replaced with : sphere, domain or kingdom.
Bonus Essay Question on the Topic of Science & Technology Issues
Q13: Technological advancements always bring about social equality. How far do you agree?
Question seeks to establish if there is a causal link between technological advancements and ‘social equality’ and if so, how strong is the ink between them
Definition of Key Concepts
Technological advancements refer to recent developments and advancements in technology including but not limited to medical technology, educational technology, environmental technology, biotechnology and whether they have led to a more level playing field in society. Social equality often involves minimizing the differences reducing the gap or providing for shared access to social resources by various social groups including the government and its people, the educated and less educated, the specialists / professionals (experts) and the lay public. the rich and poor, those in power and those in a subordinate position in any organizational hierarchy.
A: The causal link is a valid one
Educational technology has the potential to narrow the income inequalities between the haves and have nots since children from less privileged backgrounds that have access to computers (made equally available in government schools) can pick up skills pertinent to the new economy which would ultimately enable them to compete with children from more privileged homes in the future. It is assumed therefore that they have equal opportunities to escape from the cycle of poverty.
Communications technology facilitate free expression and allow for the free exchange of ideas and opinions via new media tools which are easily accessible to the public such as blogs, chats, websites, video sharing sites such as Youtube and citizen journalism (STOMP).
Information technology allows for highly specialised information previously available only those who were certified professionals, to be made accessible to the public via medical websites for information pertaining to health and medical issues. The same point applies to other aspect of our personal well-being like financial management and the acquisition of financial literacy, so that members of the lay public now know something that were the exclusive preserve of trained experts in the past.
Green technologies Research and development in new environmental technologies such as solar energy and wind power have enabled more countries (besides the G8 nations and superpowers) to invest in these forms of technologies for economic and industrial growth (e.g. Singapore’s business investment in Newater recycling/purification plants, desalination plants and solar energy plants).
Biotechnology – GM technologies have the potential to solve the global problem of hunger when rich countries share their expertise with poor countries on better farming techniques which increase crop quality and yield.
Medical technology and the provision of vaccines and more affordable medicine for those in the Third World. The poor have the opportunity to enjoy a longer life expectancy and a higher quality of life due to medical advancements.
B: The causal link is an invalid one
Presence of intervening factors: Governments may threaten to close down servers if server providers refuse to abide by their regulators to the benefits of more open communication through the Internet may be undermined. Censorship material suggests that governments are still able to restrict freedom of expression.
Pre-Existing Domestic Non-technological Difficulties: The rich-poor divide could be widened as the poor may not, even from the outset, be able to ben technological advancements due to problems like lack of education and job opportunities… ( playing field is created by technology: computers may be inaccessible to those in poor countries).
Conflict of interests: Rich countries may be unwilling to share their new technologies with the poor- the benefits of GM tech may be reserved only for farmers in the developed countries. The benefits of biotechnology are limited to those who can afford it (e.g. cloning of pets, designer babies, stem cell research). Also, Green technologies may widen the disparity between rich and poor nations the growing of c biofuels has been criticised for worsening the global food crisis, and the poor are the ones most affected by rising food prices.
Misplaced priorities: Nuclear technology has been abused by rogue, corrupt governments (e.g. North Korea) to cause disparity between the rich and poor- starvation is rampant in countries that deliberately direct resources towards nuclear development instead of economic development.
More GP Essay answers in our GP tuition revision guide, for our Anderson JC GP tuition students. The focus will be to design a creditable GP essay response, with sufficient insights and mature observations. This will surely ensure your score for GP Paper 1 is an ‘A’ grade.
Development of JJC in Future